Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Why is face pattern failing?
bruce_williams
Member, Developers Posts: 842 EDU
Circular Feature pattern works but Face pattern of 3 rib faces returns 'pattern could not be created on the same part'. Linear Face pattern works. I left the failing feature in the document here.
www.accuratepattern.com
0
Best Answers
-
john_mcclary Member, Developers Posts: 3,938 PROYes, @ethan_1 is correct, feature pattern is the correct usage here.
5 -
NeilCooke Moderator, Onshape Employees Posts: 5,714Face pattern only works if each instance shares the same faces - in your case, the sides of the block are different.Senior Director, Technical Services, EMEAI1
-
mahir Member, Developers Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭✭✭Alternatively, you can choose to not merge your rib, use a part pattern, and then join the bodies with a boolean. OS seems to lead you away from using feature patterns since it's more costly to rebuild.5
Answers
Thank you for your responses. Feature certainly works.
John or anyone - you seem more knowledgeable about the 'correct use' What is the criteria for using Face vs Feature besides what works.. ? Seems to me the geometry should work either way and I remember Face pattern is less 'costly' than Feature. And again, Linear Face pattern works with the three rib faces...
Extra credit @mahir
Thanks!