<p>Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.</p></p><strong>First time visiting? Here are some places to start:</strong></p><ol style="list-style:inherit;margin-left:25px;"><li>Looking for a certain topic? Check out the <a href="https://forum.onshape.com/categories">categories filter</a> or use Search (upper right).</li><li>Need support? <a href="https://forum.onshape.com/post/question/community-support">Ask a question</a> to our <a href="https://forum.onshape.com/categories/community-support">Community Support</a> category.</li><li>Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the <a href="https://forum.onshape.com/categories/product-feedback">Product Feedback category</a>.</li><li>Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.</li></ol><p>If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to <a href="https://forum.onshape.com/profile/6/LouGallo">send a private message</a> or <a href="mailto:lgallo@onshape.com">an email</a>.
</p>
</p>
Why is face pattern failing?
bruce_williams
Member, Developers Posts: 842 EDU
Circular Feature pattern works but Face pattern of 3 rib faces returns 'pattern could not be created on the same part'. Linear Face pattern works. I left the failing feature in the document here.


www.accuratepattern.com
0
Best Answers
-
Yes, @ethan_1 is correct, feature pattern is the correct usage here.
5 -
Face pattern only works if each instance shares the same faces - in your case, the sides of the block are different.Senior Director, Technical Services, EMEA1
-
Alternatively, you can choose to not merge your rib, use a part pattern, and then join the bodies with a boolean. OS seems to lead you away from using feature patterns since it's more costly to rebuild.5
Answers
-
Not sure why its failing, but under the drop down where it says face pattern if you change that to a feature pattern and select Rib 1 it works.1
-
Yes, @ethan_1 is correct, feature pattern is the correct usage here.
5 -
@ethan_1 & @john_mceleney
Thank you for your responses. Feature certainly works.
John or anyone - you seem more knowledgeable about the 'correct use' What is the criteria for using Face vs Feature besides what works..
? Seems to me the geometry should work either way and I remember Face pattern is less 'costly' than Feature. And again, Linear Face pattern works with the three rib faces...
www.accuratepattern.com0 -
Face pattern only works if each instance shares the same faces - in your case, the sides of the block are different.Senior Director, Technical Services, EMEA1
-
Alternatively, you can choose to not merge your rib, use a part pattern, and then join the bodies with a boolean. OS seems to lead you away from using feature patterns since it's more costly to rebuild.5
-
www.accuratepattern.com0




