Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Boolean with offset does not work on complicated fillet surfaces
dana_kelley262
Member Posts: 31 ✭
In this document there are two Boolean. The first leaves out the two surfaces that cause a failure. The second only has the two surfaces that cause the failure.
The offset of 0.015" is being used. Without the offset it works.
Initially I selected 0.015" offset all given that is the desired result.
Why doesn't this work?
0
Best Answers
-
NeilCooke Moderator, Onshape Employees Posts: 5,714dana_kelley262 said:Thanks for your feedback. Interesting solution. I've submitted a bug report to find out what the issue is before moving forward.
The reason the fillet is "split" as in @steve_shubin 's image above, is that the original geometry (before the fillet) has four edges sharing a single vertex.
Senior Director, Technical Services, EMEAI5 -
dana_kelley262 Member Posts: 31 ✭Never mind............. missed selecting the small wedged faces in the move face
0
Answers
I don’t know why the boolean with offset failed.
But if you’re interested in a workaround,
see the document below.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/68bc73df32d1e5351be70c4f/w/16f68abd9376f30ca3cdfd84/e/d7696fbbd6d958faf1c8209c
I got it to work by using a single boolean — the way you wanted it to work
I used REPLACE FACE to eliminate the lines shown below. Then I was able to use a single boolean with offset on ALL THE FACES.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/4ae02264d7f77c75f8239e4a/w/b96aafb51f9cc03b34ab1898/e/7e3aa785b65a1369e2142982
The reason the fillet is "split" as in @steve_shubin 's image above, is that the original geometry (before the fillet) has four edges sharing a single vertex.