Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Comments
Using multiple transform methods and keying in rotation angles and translation values isn't acceptable.
In fact, every derived (whatever) will have a transformation associated with it, so just put it in the derived method. The transformation should always be part of the derived method.
I was excited about the "derived" enhancement thinking I could now create a layout in OS using a part studio.
Eloquently put.
+1 for every paragraph
And I would make one of your points even more explicit, for the avoidance of doubt: the reason "multiple transform methods and keying in rotation angles and translation values" isn't acceptable is not solely because it's laborious:
it's because the result is essentially dead, where it frequently needs to be very much alive
(in the sense of, adapting to changes to model dimensions etc)
Hole tool (and maybe extrude too) should have option to automatically create mate connector which would speed up deriving dowels, bolts, washers and other fasteners.
I think I agree.
It will take a number of thought experiments to be sure (as much as one ever can be about the future)... but I certainly see a strong case for the mate connector paradigm to be greatly extended and enhanced.
Isn't it easy to be on this side of development, just throw ideas in and let someone else decide if they are useful or not
Linked[in]