Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Feed back on who is using your public and shared parts
brucebartlett
Member, OS Professional, Mentor, User Group Leader Posts: 2,140 PRO
It would be nice to know who is using/viewing your public and shared parts.
I want some snapchat inspired features so I know when my parts are being copied are even screen shoot. It might be also nice to have a LIKE button on public parts, parts with the most likes go to the top of the list. What are other people thought's?
I want some snapchat inspired features so I know when my parts are being copied are even screen shoot. It might be also nice to have a LIKE button on public parts, parts with the most likes go to the top of the list. What are other people thought's?
2
Comments
Linked[in]
Twitter: @onshapetricks & @babart1977
UX/PD/Community Support
Others have seemed to gone down the path of blocking the screen out with an images of the public parts/models. Onshape have gone with a listing style, I think the onshape style looks good for my private parts (however don't like having to click to preview). I am after more detail if searching for a public part to steal bits from eg. likes and downloads telling its got quality and might be worth a look.
As the creator of a public part, it would be nice to see how many downloads/copies have been performed.
Twitter: @onshapetricks & @babart1977
Also it might be nice to have a timeout feature on a shared part eg. share for 2hrs, 2days or 1 week.
Twitter: @onshapetricks & @babart1977
Twitter: @onshapetricks & @babart1977
I don't want cad.onshape.com to be social in any way. I go in here to get focused work done. As soon as we have chat, news feeds, and whatnot, productivity has just been tossed right out the window. Stats would be nice, but they drive a desire for popularity not a desire for good work. I would see any features added in this area as diluting the utility of Onshape.
THAT SAID: I think it would be awesome to have "make public" and "allow public fork". I was really hoping for public forking when I first came to Onshape, as I am trying to get a few open source projects started up and don't want to hassle with user management.
The main thing I want on the home screen is a better search feature that you can add filters too and will drill into the part names and properties.
Twitter: @onshapetricks & @babart1977
Another thread about this: https://forum.onshape.com/discussion/630/favorite-public-documents
Twitter: @onshapetricks & @babart1977
Even for pro models, I would like to see rating (1-5) and how many times it's copied. And wouldn't be bothered if there was (collapsed) list of comments. I think this would make it a lot easier to find good components to use in real modeling.
And if documents are shared by company who want's to sell them (actual component, not data), there should be company info and description. No advertising though.
If onshape want's to be cruel they could offer professional public models by manufacturers only for paid pro accounts... I wouldn't blame them if they did.
My only concern is that if you follow every customer request you could easily get bloated software.
For example, if people just started putting "REPO" in front of their public repositories, and there was an option to allow public forking within the document, that might handle all three cases without adding much more than a checkbox in the share window.
I actually don't like rating systems for documents because the "best" ones are the most popular, not the best ones. Have things sorted by rating and you run into an issue where old documents are always on top. I think this is a bad idea for innovation.