Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
More intelligent pop-up window placement.
Hi folks.
I often find that when opening a pop-up window (for an extrude for example) the window covers the features I wish to select.
Not sure if this is a good idea or not but would it be possible for OnS to look for the nearest blank part of the screen that is big enough to place the window without covering existing geometry?
Obviously on a busy screen this may not be possible, and perhaps having the widow appear in a different place each time may be irritating?
Just a thought.
Owen S.
HWM-Water Ltd
Comments
With the sleek wonderfullness of most of Onshape this seems a bit dumb by comparison:-
I also seem to have lots of instances of the pop-ups refusing to move, so instead end up having to pan the part away from under the pop-up.
Cheers, Owen S.
HWM-Water Ltd
But consider the following, when things start moving around in different places each time, you lose muscle memory.
In my humble opinion, when dialogue boxes start opening in new places, because the placement algorithm is trying to guess what feature you wanted.. that becomes even more annoying.
Not sure what the answer is but it's nice to bounce ideas and opinions about.
Personally I want to forget the icons, implement customisable voice recognition, and I'll just make StarWars noises at OS. Wookie noise for line, R2D2 for circle etc.
Owen S.
HWM-Water Ltd
+1 for keeping the code simple and bug free (I'm not going to write IR for this, +1 will have to do in this case )
3D space mice are overrated.. All you can do is roll around your view.
I'd rather have 24 commands on one thumb ;p
I see your useless tool, and I raise you the Master Sword, Do everything with your right hand and hold your coffee with the left.
I have mouse with two buttons on left and I always hit one of them when on phone and quickly grab mouse - I don't wan't that
But I do have three buttons on top so I do have access to pan with right hand.
I don't know if you use perspective mode a lot but if you do you know one can only zoom to certain point with mouse - with 3d mouse zoom goes further and fly inside the models. I like this when working with buildings or layout stuff (model area ca 100x100 meters).
Working with only mouse in right hand feels like driving a car using just gear stick. I like to steer with one hand and handle controls with other.
That makes me so productive that I can sit back and relax for coffee break
Cheers, Owen S.
HWM-Water Ltd
You might wan't to think about the version with few more buttons. With wise mapping it makes you keyboard almost unnecessary while modeling.
And give it some time; adjust the speeds, try reversing certain axises, drink coffee, goto bar and try again. After you find the right setting and feeling, mouse feels so slow and clomsy..
The "SpaceMouse Pro Wireless" looks like it will do very nicely.
For real nerd porn then this gets me excited
But I'm not sure my purchasing manager will agree
Cheers,
Owen S.
HWM-Water Ltd
HWM-Water Ltd
@john_mcclary I take it you have experience with this one, or similar mice? I was thinking of getting one to make life easier (I drink a lot of coffee). Any particular mouse you'd recommend, or is this the Lord of Master Swords?
Fairly certain my Purchasing Manager wouldn't agree with me ordering a SpaceMouse Pro.
there are a couple of of similar mice out there to choose from.
I started using the Razr Naga at first, and it does pretty well, (kinda small in the hand)
It has the same amount of buttons as whats shown above, and costs about the same
It has a little more weight to it, and feels like it's higher quality
Then I tried the Logitech G600 (shown above). I pretty much stopped looking after that
It has the same amount of buttons as the naga, BUT the "ring-finger rest" is actually another button.
It's job is to re-map ALL of the other buttons. (the naga has a toggle switch on the bottom of the mouse) Which gives you a grand total of 72 commands just on your thumb. (If you set it up completely) (3 modes 12 thumb buttons * 2 green shift/layouts)
so you get way more options on the logitech.
It's much larger and lighter than the naga, and feels really low quality. But the thumb buttons are contoured to help 'feel' your way around. after a while on each, you stop thinking about the feel, you just squeeze the mouse and everyone behind you wonders what the hell you just did so damn fast.
both can detect what program you're using and can change it's profile depending on what you are working on.
But I've blow through 4 or 5 of each (between work and home and friends) and they are pretty much equal as far as durability and longevity. been using them since they came on the market.
If you decide to get one let me know and I'll help you tailor the button layout, I've got one which works with pretty much everything without having to re-program it for each application (more for SW tho) haven't made an onshape one yet, I'm sure there will a lot of sketching and constraining functions when I do
note because I use a dvorak keyboard i had to re-map a few things in each program (like ctrl+q is ctrl+' to me)..
so if you see below just think of the possibilities.
What did you do to him
@3dcad What is that thing? No buttons, no scroll wheel, no configuration possibilities from what I can see... would it squeal on right-click?
It's new industry 4.0 standard mouse where all intelligence becomes together; electrics, gene manipulation, brain-computer interface etc.
You just think and mouse will move on it's own
Development is at beta state and it currently needs some additional cheese for proper control.
Brain > mouse > computer... something tells me the mouse becomes highly redundant, unless it can fetch you coffee. In which case I recommend limiting the amount of cheese to an absolute minimum; wouldn't want that mouse to go haywire(less) spilling coffee everywhere.
Also, please resist any and all temptation to develop industry 4.0 bugs... bit creepy.