Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
How to import .x_t assembly, and modify a part
Mark_Sanders
Member Posts: 17 ✭✭
I'm new to this party and it's really cool.
Whilst starting modelling from scratch seems really straightforward, I'm struggling with importing stuff done in other cad (eg solidworks) .... I can get it into on space but that's about it.
Can someone give me the best work flow to
1. Import an assembly - .x_t, ideally or solidworks ...( I assume Both these are dumb solids, no feature trees )
2. Then isolate one part to modify.
3. Modify that part ... Stretch, resize / move holes & features.
4. Save back into assembly as an improved product.
Seeing the rest of the interface this is probably really obvious, but my prior 'conditioning' on other systems is making me blind to the obvious ;-)
Mark
Whilst starting modelling from scratch seems really straightforward, I'm struggling with importing stuff done in other cad (eg solidworks) .... I can get it into on space but that's about it.
Can someone give me the best work flow to
1. Import an assembly - .x_t, ideally or solidworks ...( I assume Both these are dumb solids, no feature trees )
2. Then isolate one part to modify.
3. Modify that part ... Stretch, resize / move holes & features.
4. Save back into assembly as an improved product.
Seeing the rest of the interface this is probably really obvious, but my prior 'conditioning' on other systems is making me blind to the obvious ;-)
Mark
Tagged:
0
Comments
LearnOnshape facebook group
Me, I think you're walking to the deep end of the pool and you'll have more fun in the shallow end.
Build some simple parts, construct some movable assemblies and try to find someone to collaborate on a design. I think this is a better use of your time.
Cheers,
I think we can, should and will make improvements to smooth out the workflow for importing and translating.
Thanks Ben for your how-to-writeup.
And per Bills' post: Mark if you need someone to collaborate with just let me know -- I'd be happy to.
forum post:
link importing SW
link to actual import results:
link importing SW
forum post on flipping geometry:
link flipping importing SW
Mark I was able to import my SW geometry, flip it to a proper orientation, and re-parameterize it inside OS. It went pretty smoothly and now I have a OS database created from a SW design. It definitely can be done. If you figure out a simpler method, please let us know.
I've always wanted collaboration and now it's here. I haven't played with it or even looked into it, I must be crazy. I think this will be a huge differentiator between current CAD systems.
Please take him up on his offer and share with us the process. I'm extremely interested.
I found the rest of my import geometry legacy:
importing SW
flipping geometry
re-parameterize geometry
assembling geometry
huge thanks to you all .. @ben @bill @Johnfelix @JonHirschtick
yes .. I am paddling in the shallow end, basking in videos, as well as having a splash at the deep end :-)
Isolated 1 part and can now hack it about :-)
So far basic cuts / add on etc.
Me (or OS) not yet up to warps, twists and base geometry tweaks -- but hey it is a fully developed diecasting ready for tooling :-)
still playing in shallow and deep ends.
Make sure to put in bug / enhancement requests in the 'feedback' menu item as you go. using this menu item on the '?' button:
Ahem! Feel free to... you know... maybe... add requests for 'sketch element cut and paste', and 'box selection in sketches and modeling environments'. I would say drawings and DXF but I am 99% sure they are on their way.
LearnOnshape facebook group
"That is what I am doing and each day it becomes more and more the tool of choice for me."
Ben, I'm noticing the same thing. It's in those small things...
E.g. Boolean > Subtract > Keep Tools: very simple, very natural, very fast...brilliant!
Or...
Extrude > New or Add or Remove or Intersect
Despite the current lack of some productivity-oriented tools (did I mention section views? , thin features, advanced patterning...), these small things are real productivity boosters, compared to a SolidWorks workflow.
Dries