Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Performance test results
3dcad
Member, OS Professional, Mentor Posts: 2,475 PRO
I thought it might be helpful for people looking for new hardware if they see results with different sets.
Take test here: https://cad.onshape.com/check and post your result.
Not bad for couple years old custom pc with about $1500 parts. A lot better result than $2500 brand new Thinkpad..
Take test here: https://cad.onshape.com/check and post your result.
Not bad for couple years old custom pc with about $1500 parts. A lot better result than $2500 brand new Thinkpad..
//rami
Tagged:
2
Comments
Maybe a Black Friday present to myself and this i5 Windows 10 Dell is in order?
Twitter: @bradleysauln
Eduardo Magdalena C2i Change 2 improve ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?
Partner de PTC - Onshape Averigua a quién conocemos en común
I also got two wildly different results when I used it right now. First run had .2 million measured triangles per second and 100 something million measured lines per second. After refreshing, I got the above results.
Is there a point of diminishing returns for local graphics power using Onshape? 3dcad's results are fairly close to mine with a 4 generation old gaming card. These results could be very important for anybody considering using Onshape for enterprise use. If you'll get equal results out of a mid range vs high end computer, there could be some considerable cost savings without sacrificing performance. Also, any word on how CPU plays into performance vs GPU?
I'd like to see a video of a "high performance" versus "low performance" workstation doing the same task, so I can interpret these numbers.
Is there any way to submit these performance test results to get a better aggregate look at hardware performance for Onshape? It would be interesting to see what the best cost:performance hardware is.
Also, I don't know why show the message "Your browser does not disclose this information" instead of my NVIDIA information.
Eduardo Magdalena C2i Change 2 improve ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?
Partner de PTC - Onshape Averigua a quién conocemos en común
I got better result with Chrome than FF. And also overall performance actually using Onshape is better with Chrome for me.
I suppose it's the complete setup that counts rather than individual part of it..
"At the end of the day, it’s your choice and Onshape gives you plenty"
I use Chrome and Firefox. Now we have some metrics to improve the performance a little more
Eduardo Magdalena C2i Change 2 improve ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?
Partner de PTC - Onshape Averigua a quién conocemos en común
projektowanieproduktow.wordpress.com
I guess it shows what I've known all along, buy nvidea. Why macs now use intel graphics chip I have no idea, kinda of ruins the pleasure of owning a mac.
The performance check works by giving the browser and GPU work to do, then measuring the framerate at which it can do that work. Browsers limit the maximum framerate for a page to 60 frames per second. So the test searches for your system's limits by increasing the workload until the framerate starts to drop.
A performance measurement that ends up in the “grey” zone does not necessarily mean that you will experience slow performance. A system that has comparatively low performance may run just fine with models of moderate size. As a design grows in complexity, the amount of geometry tends to grow with it. It is for these larger models where you will see benefits of a more powerful GPU, like faster view manipulation and selection.
For this particular performance test, internet connection speed does not come into play. The data are loaded and tested locally on your machine to gauge system hardware performance. However, in general connection speed is a factor for things like model load times.
The accuracy of the performance measurements are subject to the general load on your system, and to some particulars of how the browser runtime interacts with our software. For best results when running the check:
http://www.bjordan.org.uk/onshape/perf2.png
Not only do the numbers look much better but, subjectively, Onshape feels crisper particularly when I look at larger models.
https://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-GAMING-Support-04G-P4-6253-KR/dp/B01MF7EQJZ/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&rps=1&ie=UTF8&qid=1480292666&sr=1-1&keywords=gtx+1050&refinements=p_85:2470955011
Can you post your results with that..?
Setup price with second hand Z600 about 800€ 1 year ago
My T430 with HD4000 is pretty bad
i7-4910MQ @2.9GHz
32 GB
Win 7...
Nvidia settings? only ever played NES 8 bit so...
Oh it was WAY over $2500, but it is certified for SW. Yay.
It really doesn't matter for me because Onshape works smoothly Even the integrated graphics works ok.
Only tested on my integrated 3K screen. Read that an external screen should/ could force the GPU to work better or at least the entire time.
I'd really appreciate if someone could give me some hints on what settings to use for this NVIDIA K2100M and Onshape (Chrome). Maybe some do's and don'ts?
Huh? Not compatible? It seems to work. Is there something I need to do?
Your browser is not fully compatible with Onshape
Browser
Performance check
Onshape server region
Report
Notifications (0 new, 0 total)
I recently updated my desktop computer from an nVidia Quadro 600 to an nVidia GTX 1050 Ti. I purchased the GTX card for about $150. Attached are my results of running 7 tests for each card in Chrome with only the test tab open. I did each test after a fresh re-boot just in case... My setup was a Windows 10 (64 bit) machine that I had used for consulting design work with another MCAD program. 8GB Ram.
The GTX 1050 Ti processes on average 7.44 times more triangles per second and 12.38 more lines per second.
And for anyone interested... here is the link to the item I purchased: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01MF7EQJZ/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1