Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Comments
Notice the NVIDIA row at the bottom left, which says only 7% of the GPU resources are being used. I have never seen it above 15% while using Onshape, even though it does spike a slight bit in more demanding tasks. This is very different from what I see when I run the Onshape performance test:
I took this capture before the GPU resources peaked at over 90%. Not sure why the performance test would tap so much into my NVIDIA GPU when my modeling work doesn't. I've gone through all the browser configuring and driver updating there is to do. Anyway, just thought I'd share. Anyone else seeing the same discrepancy?
Performance is determined by many factors -- the GPU is responsible for only certain aspects. Please see my blog post on the subject: https://www.onshape.com/cad-blog/under-the-hood-how-onshapes-development-team-tackles-cad-performance especially the table in the post.
The performance tests works by drawing a bunch of geometry into a buffer. It starts with a small amount of geometry and scales up how much geometry is being drawn until the framerate drops below a certain threshold (i.e. until the GPU can no longer keep up with the amount of geometry we are asking it to draw). Then we report the results back to you. For that I would definitely expect a ramp up to a spike.
For normal usage, if you are not interacting with the model, the system would not being doing any redraws. So as Daniel says, maybe wiggle the model around for a while and watch that panel to see how it changes. If your graphics card is good enough, you may even just register blips until you open something really complicated and wiggle it around.
at least on mine, it won't go past 2ghz unless it's plugged in.
@bill_daniels
I had the same problem, see https://forum.onshape.com/discussion/12065/no-results-from-performance-check#latest.
But today I got my results of a DELL G7 7790 with a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060.
HWM-Water Ltd
I recently splurged on a new laptop and a shovel ... to bury the old HP. Discrete graphics increase the performance by more than an order of magnitude. There is significant variability though. Might that have something to do with the whims of an internet connection?
I was using the Dell Vostro 7500 with GTX 1650ti, but the improved graphics, 120hz, brighter display, and ability to use it with battery power make a considerable difference in everyday use.
Below are test results of a Ryzen 3 5300G. I ran tests with both 2666MHz and 3200MHz ram in both Edge and Chrome. Chrome performed better so these results are from Chrome.
First, here are the results from the slower 2666MHz ram:
And here are the results from the faster 3200MHz ram.
Because of low utilization, I am ignoring the difference in quantity of ram. The 2666 kit was two 4GB sticks for a total of 8GB. The 3200MHz kit is two 16GB sticks for a total of 32GB.